Codex Alimentarius and Dietary Supplement Safety Act of 2010 (S. 3002
May 4th, 2010 -- Posted in health protection information | 22 Comments »
McCain bill threatens access to vitamins and supplements
http://www.naturalnews.com/028257_Senator_McCain_dietary_supplements.html
Codex Alimentarius: Population Control Under the Guise of Consumer Protection
http://www.naturalnews.com/024128.html
Food Safety Bill HR 2749 Requires Immediate Opposition
http://www.naturalnews.com/026488_food_food_safety_health.html
Codex Alimentarius (World Food Code)
Summarized in 7 Points
http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?page_id=157
Stop Federal Takeover of Food Regulation in H.R. 875
This is a good article with links for contacting:
http://www.naturalnews.com/025824.html
Defeat HR 875-information flyer
http://www.campaignforliberty.com/blog.php?view=13332
How about the end of farm markets? Say hello to H.R. 875
This is a good link breaking the Bill down:
http://cryptogon.com/?p=7362
Monsanto’s dream bill, HR 875
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Monsanto-s-dream-bill-HR-by-Linn-Cohen-Cole-090309-337.html
Stimulus Bill to Destroy Health Freedom
http://wholesomeherald.blogspot.com/
Natural Solutions Foundation
http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/
These latest food Bills do NOT have our safety in mind. This is a move to obtain tyrannical control of the food supply.
Codex Alimentarius does not get near enough attention. Codex Alimentarius represents the single largest threat to our health and freedom. We are talking about control of our food supply and the banning of vitamins herbal supplements. Organic seeds will be considered contaminants and you will be fed the GMO crap that has no nutrients.
If the food supply becomes this controlled, it will matter more than money. THE ISSUE OF CODEX ALIMENTARIUS HAS IMPLICATIONS FAR OUTREACHING 9/11 TRUTH, FEMA CAMPS, OR THE DOLLAR COLLAPSE. AS IT IS ALREADY, AND BY GOVERNMENT ADMITTED FIGURES, MORE THAN 100,000 PEOPLE DIE EACH YEAR IN THE UNITED STATES DUE TO PROPERLY PRESCRIBED DRUGS. IMAGINE THESE SAME CORPORATIONS CONTROLLING ALL YOUR FOOD, ALL YOUR MEDICINES, AND BANNING ALL NATURAL HEALTH MEANS. THESE ARE THEIR GOALS!
A speech by Ian R. Freeman
I transcribed the main points of the video:
The profitability of the top 10 pharmaceutical companies exceeded the profitablity of the other 490 companies in Fortune 500. These companies have teams of people working on strategies to maximize the opportunity brought about by the implementation of Codex Alimentarius. Codex serves the interest of Big Pharma. And what is really a concern is the World Trade Organization will implement Codex using Napoleon Law.
Common Law means unless something is considered specifically bad it is ok. Napoleonic Law is completely opposite. Unless something is specifically mentioned, it is banned. What the pharmaceutical companies and the food companies are trying to do with the Codex Committee
is to make the testing process so outrageously expensive that the only people who can get things on the approved list are the Monsantos and the Pharmaceutical companies. Nobody else will be able to afford to go through the rigorous tests that you have to go through to get a product unto the approved list.
This has already been tried before in the United States in 1994. It was defeated because of the public outcry, but still a lot of people never heard about it because of a lack of international and national mainstream media coverage.
But it is back in the form of:
Food Safety and Tracking Improvement Act S424 and Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009 HR875.
I have read both these Bills and they serve the globalist agenda. There are vague definitions in the bills to give wide reaching scope and I saw where there was a fine of $100, 000 a day per offense. These draconian bills HAVE to be stopped!
Paul Turner
Codex Alimentarius P1 Very good – Please watch
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmrF9KjlGsc
H.R. 875: Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-875
Food Safety and Tracking Improvement Act. (Introduced in Senate)
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:S.425:
Criminalization of Organic Farms
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/85235
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJ5MOe5muAU
The top ten reasons why organized medicine supports CODEX ALIMENTARIUS
http://www.naturalnews.com/009532.html
One Dollar DVDs – Ian Crane about CODEX
http://www.onedollardvdproject.com/DVD-new/Vids12.html
Duration : 0:7:23
Its about economy of scale. When you sign up for healthcare coverage, you join a group of other people to combine your healthcare purchasing power. Your insurer covers the whole group, rather than individuals, so everyone shares the cost of staying healthy.-Stay Smart Stay Healthy
***R.I.P. Sis***
Be My Friend – http://www.myspace.com/psychtruth
http://www.TheRawInspiration.com
It should totally cover third-leg attachments and heightening surgery. Note: this video is not made to support socialism, though some of the passersby might suggest it as a solution. K?
Go to http://BuildMuscleBurnFat.info/ my FREE workout plan Build Muscle and Burn Fat FAST AS HELL! 
Be My Friend – http://www.myspace.com/psychtruth
The Truth about Diet and Weight Loss 
A surgical mask is not a respirator and that’s an important distinction for physicians and all healthcare workers to understand. Unfortunately many healthcare employers and Infection Preventionist do not understand this important fact. Several reports from the US Institute of Medicine (IOM) over the past few years have address this and related issues. For the details of this debate, go to the 2009 IOM report at http://www.iom.edu/~/media/Files/Report%20Files/2009/RespProtH1N1/H1N1%20report%20brief%20FINAL%20for%20web.ashx . It is important that healthcare employers and workers understand the significant differences between these two types of personal protective equipment. The decision whether or not to require workers to use either surgical masks or respirators must be based upon a hazard analysis of the workers’ specific work environments and the different protective properties of each type of personal protective equipment. Respirators are designed to reduce a worker’s exposure to airborne contaminants. Respirators come in various sizes and must be individually selected to fit the wearer’s face and to provide a tight seal. A proper seal between the user’s face and the respirator forces inhaled air to be pulled through the respirator’s filter material and not through gaps between the face and respirator. Surgical masks are used as a physical barrier to protect the user from hazards, such as splashes of large droplets of blood or body fluids. Surgical masks also protect other people against infection from the person wearing the surgical mask. Such masks trap large particles of body fluids that may contain bacteria or viruses expelled by the wearer. Surgical masks are not designed or certified to prevent the inhalation of small airborne contaminants. An OSHA video describing the differences is found at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovSLAuY8ib8 . All workers have a right to a safe and healthful workplace. Whenever respiratory protection is required to be worn to protect from hazardous airborne contaminants, the employer is responsible for implementing a comprehensive respiratory protection program and providing an appropriate respirator, in accordance with OSHAs respiratory protection standard, 29 CFR 1910.134. This program must include training, medical evaluation, and fit testing. When workers must wear a respirator to protect against airborne contaminants in the workplace, it is very important to follow proper procedures for putting it on and taking it off. For more on this important issues for healthcare, go to the OSHA factsheet, Respiratory Infection Control:Respirators Versus Surgical Masks at https://www.osha.gov/Publications/respirators-vs-surgicalmasks-factsheet.html . This is clipped from the 2000 video Biological Warfare and Terrorism: The Military and Public Health Response produced by the Department of the Army and the Food and Drug Administration. The entire video has been digitized by the nonprofit Public.Resource.Org (http://public.resource.org/index.html ) in a cooperative agreement with the National Technical Information (http://public.resource.org/ntis.gov/index.html ) and is available at the Internet Archive at www.archive.com .